As liquidity points surround the Digital Currency Group (DCG), Three Arrows Capital (3AC) founder Su Zhu made a Twitter thread containing allegations towards DCG and FTX. Nonetheless, the founder instantly obtained referred to as out by the crypto group for blaming others and never taking accountability.
Within the thread, Zhu alleged that DCG had a task within the collapse of LUNA, now referred to as Terra Basic (LUNC). Zhu claimed that the enterprise capital agency conspired with the FTX trade to assault LUNC and made a revenue by doing so. The 3AC founder additionally mentioned that as an alternative of restructuring from losses because of the 3AC chapter, DCG “magically crammed the outlet.”
Regardless of Zhu’s efforts to demonize DCG and FTX, the group believes that he ought to give attention to his personal misdeeds.
So it was everybody else’s fault and you are taking no private duty in any respect on your actions?
— DeFi Alex (@swaggyAlexyo) January 3, 2023
The Each day Gwei host and Ether bull Anthony Sassano additionally referred to as out Zhu on Twitter. Sassano employed sarcasm, saying that everybody was behind the 3AC collapse apart from Zhu and co-founder Kyle Davis. “They’re completely harmless events who have been merely compelled to be on the shedding facet of extremely worthwhile buying and selling methods,” he wrote.
In the meantime, the 3AC bankruptcy process faces difficulties as its founders could also be positioned in Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates, the place it might be tough to implement courtroom orders. Legal professionals who characterize liquidators have claimed that the 3AC founders have didn’t coordinate with liquidators up to now few months regardless of agreeing to a communications protocol.
Associated: 3AC subpoenas issued as dispute grows over claims of Terraform dump
On Dec. 2, the authorized staff for liquidators additionally called out the 3AC founders for speaking to the media and being lively on social media whereas failing to interact with them. The authorized staff claimed that the founders solely had restricted discussions with liquidators and often modified jurisdictions.
